So, in conclusion you don't need to spend any more than 2$ to enjoy a wine. You might have to taste around for one that YOU like but they are out there. You don't even have to spend 30-40$ because we sure don't most of the time. I've never tasted a first growth Chateauneuf du Pape and I definitely would never spend 700$ on a bottle. If I was given a bottle or a free glass I sure as hell would savor it and brag to everyone I know. Just kidding. Sorta. Or if I suddenly came into millions of dollars from a rich uncle that I don't know about dying and leaving it all to me I MIGHT buy one. Who am I kidding I would buy D a new car, us a new house, me a new bike (or 2...ok 3) and a LOT of other things before I would ever spend that much on wine.
So if like this guy below you can tell the difference between a spoiled wine, a BAD wine, a 2$ wine, a GOOD wine, and a great wine you are 1 step from being a wine writer.
Anyone else think scoring wines is stupid? Put your hands up you know you do! How the hell can you RATE a wine? What makes one 92 points another 89? Here's a quote that sums up my thoughts on wine and whether or not it's "good." It comes from a wine blogger and writer at Winetastingguy.com
"I figure I can break wine down into a few general categories.
- A flawed wine - a wine that has something clearly wrong with it
- a bad wine – a wine that isn’t technically spoiled (or flawed) but it is just plain bad
- a decent wine – this could be a wine that is OK, drinkable, but really nothing to write home about
- a good wine – this is a wine that is enjoyable and while not mind blowing, if priced right (under $20) can be real pleasurable
- a great wine – this is a wine wherein all the parts have come together and the stuff inside this bottle is just damn good.
No comments:
Post a Comment